 |
|
Tactical Challenge 5 - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: The Operational Art of War (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Thread: Tactical Challenge 5 (/showthread.php?tid=56918) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Kru - 11-18-2010 At least one more competitor, and we can announce results. Any takers? RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Kru - 11-23-2010 The deadline for submissions. 30th November 2010 23:59 GMT RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Kru - 12-02-2010 I have results. 3 players took part. Enough to share points with. Best player: FULCRUM - 11pts. (badge + 30 bonus) He captured most flags and used airborne special units to secure the score. 2nd: PATTON - 6pts. (20 bonus) Made very best attempt to breakthrough Russian line. Destroying many enemies along. Good use of recce unit to eliminate artillery support. But he scored only 6pts as major flags were not captured. No airborne units were dropped behind lines, which resulted in small score. The trick was to capture unoccupied flags as many 7pts from a single drop. 3rd: FLATFOOT40 - 4pts. (10 bonus) First attempt. Not bad for newcomer. That's all folks. RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Fulcrum - 12-02-2010 (12-02-2010, 12:46 AM)Kru Wrote: I have results. Wow...first place!! I wasn´t satisfied with my turn.....:whis: Thanks Kru for the challenge...waiting next!!! RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Currahee - 12-02-2010 Congratulations to all, and especially to Fulcrum! Bonus points are being awarded now, and an excellent badge will be awarded to Fulcrum, as soon as it's available. RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Currahee - 12-03-2010 Fulcrum's badge has been awarded- and it is wicked- check it out, guys! RE: Tactical Challenge 5 - Patton - 12-03-2010 Congratulations, Fulcrum - well done! Thanks, Kru, for putting up these little mind-benders.... I can't believe I completely forgot about the para unit; I'm going to have to try it again to see how that changes the outcome. |
){kind=link}