difficulty attacking as Soviets in Moscow 42 - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tiller Operational Campaigns (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: difficulty attacking as Soviets in Moscow 42 (/showthread.php?tid=63115) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: difficulty attacking as Soviets in Moscow 42 - Volcano Man - 11-16-2012 (11-16-2012, 09:05 AM)Strela Wrote:(11-16-2012, 07:30 AM)ComradeP Wrote: Not sure if this is the right place to ask, considering the database came from elsewhere, but why are Guards units weaker in soft attack and assault than their regular Rifle division counterparts, and what does the higher hard attack value represent at this point in the war? AT rifles? If so, why don't they have a separate company per regiment/brigade like some of the Rifle brigades? Well, this issue has come up many times in the past. All I can say is that the infantry from the original game where McNamara database was present (Campaign Series) had them rated that way, and from what I remember, they had more anti-tank rifles at platoon level and therefore their hard attack power is 4x that of the regular rifle battalions, at the cost of 1 soft and 1 assault value. This doesn't mean that either one of them is "better" it just means that they are "different". By 1943, in the database and historically speaking, the guards infantry totally outclass regular rifle battalions in all respects, so essentially there is an evolution going on in 1941-43. BTW, in the game in 1941 to 1942 this translates to guards infantry being a bit better at standing up against tanks in assaults, and probably a little better at taking bunkers. Their always higher quality makes up for the other two differences. RE: difficulty attacking as Soviets in Moscow 42 - Strela - 11-16-2012 Thanks Ed, makes sense. I wouldn't like to be thrown into an assault with an AT rifle in my hands!! |