(08-10-2020, 10:21 AM)kolc Wrote: Been a long time player of the SB series so I do appreciate all efforts to keep it going. As always it is my "goto" game for PBEM. Really do like seeing the lesser known campaigns and "minor" nation troops. Really fits into the SB scale. Not playing too much PBEM lately but will likely get more games going as summer turns to fall.

(08-10-2020, 07:23 PM)Ashcloud Wrote: Just a couple of teasers. Having fun with these.




Best regards,
Ash

(08-17-2020, 06:52 AM)todk Wrote: I love SB.  It is certainly not dead to me.

(08-17-2020, 05:28 PM)Mowgli Wrote: 1) Disrupted status needs to be visible on the counters. Disrupted is probably the most important status in the Squad Battles series, and yet you have to click through the individual units' unit cards to see it. This is the number one game breaker for me.

2) Squad Battles multiplayer suffers a lot from the fact that the defences are mostly static. Most scenarios are puzzles for the attacking player, while the defending player is just sitting in place and directing his fires. A system in which the players were given certain objectives and had to decide for themselves where to place their troops (ideally even "buy" their troops! like in Combat Mission) would make Squad Battles an interesting multiplayer title.

(08-07-2020, 11:00 AM)Warhorse Wrote: I just visited this page for like the umpteenth time today, and saw there were 20 guests, but no posts?! What are you guys doing/looking for? Some input would be good, I would love this series to thrive, am trying hard to advance it, but seems to be a dead end. There will be a lot of complaining about the top down stuff, but when I post anything about introducing the Blitzkrieg or any enhancements, there is NO input, what gives? If it is to be a dead end, I will just go away, and let this thing die, I love the series and would love to perpetuate it for a long time to come, but it seems a brick wall.