(03-06-2014, 05:37 AM)ComradeP Wrote: Were all of the Korps sized scenarios balanced towards a German victory if it happened historically? Let's take the II SS Panzer Korps July 5th scenario as an example.

You start with the same forces you have for Hill 228_6 as your active forces. However, the Soviets have all of their artillery available to them, and artillery limits are high considering the amount of casualties Katyusha's cause combined with the requirement for overstacking if you want to launch credible assaults.

I moved my men up and as the Soviets targeted the Pionier units with the artillery. Casualties were acceptable, about 13 men or so. The next turn, I assaulted the Soviets with the couple of units that could assault. None of the SMG units disrupted.

As the Soviets, I targeted the large assault stacks, which resulted in one company becoming combat ineffective. Another company followed next turn. For the cost of having lost the combat effectiveness of an entire battalion in just 2 turns of action, I captured 2 objectives. A few turns afterwards, 2 Soviet companies activate and my men are stuck, hammered by artillery.

The result was entirely predictable: good artillery, high artillery limited, only a handful of friendly units and a lot of objectives to capture. That wasn't likely to work. It often doesn't work in Hill 228_6 and it doesn't work when the Soviets have all of their artillery at their disposal, a significant chunk of which can fire at your men. It's a similar problem to what can happen in PzC: large artillery concentrations cause high losses in a limited amount of time. That combined with the rather variable results of whether or not you can capture bunkers means your men are very vulnerable.

The historical outcome of the scenario was probably a major victory: the SS successfully penetrated the first Soviet defensive lines. I wonder how many playtesters got that result.

What tactics were used to counter the Soviet cherrypicking units to attack, making them combat ineffective for the rest of the game? Isolated units can still spot, and as long as you are adjacent to a Soviet unit, it's very easy for the Soviet player to simply direct an overwhelming amount of artillery at your spearhead. Without any means of replacing your strength, that's a disaster for the Germans.

(03-09-2014, 04:18 AM)mfarl2001 Wrote: Got Kursk Southern Front last night. I'm liking the scale, and the eye candy is very nice. The games keep getting better. One thing I had a problem with is getting over the rail embankment in the second scenario, the boys were not in travel mode, and started the turn adjacent to it but still couldn't move onto it. What am I missing?

I really liked was the extra maps and OB's after a scenario r two I spent the rest of the evening pouring over the maps and OB's.

Thank you for the good work.
Oh and message me is anyone is up for a email game.

Quote:Units with Assault = 0 are automatically overrun when attacked at only
the cost of movement into the defending hex.

(03-11-2014, 05:10 PM)ComradeP Wrote: According to the manual

Quote:Units with Assault = 0 are automatically overrun when attacked at only
the cost of movement into the defending hex.

But HQ's, which have no documented assault value, defend like normal units when assaulted and don't vacate their hex. It seems some information is missing from the explanation in the manual.

I was under the impression, based on the rule, that an HQ by itself would withdraw when attacked, but that is not the case.

Edit: After checking the OOB, it seems HQ's have an undocumented assault value of 1. The big company sized Soviet HQ's are credible defensive units.