 |
|
B-17 crew survey - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Campaign Series (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: B-17 crew survey (/showthread.php?tid=37232) |
B-17 crew survey - Montana Mud - 10-07-2006 RE: B-17 crew survey - Michael - 10-08-2006 http://www.rjgeib.com/thoughts/gunner/gunner.html RE: B-17 crew survey - Montana Mud - 10-08-2006 RE: B-17 crew survey - The General - 10-10-2006 Hello... 1) Not as dangerous as legend has it...perhaps just the most frightening. 2) I believe most of the trip, but not take off or landing? 3) Answered in previous post. Good B-17 site: http://www.arizonawingcaf.com/pages/ballturret.html RE: B-17 crew survey - Mike Abberton - 10-10-2006 Has anyone ever seen a listing of how effective each gun position on a B-17 was? Or in other words, how many kills were recorded by gun position? I would guess that the tail gunner, ball turret and upper turret (plus the chin turret in later models) were highest scorers. They would have the greatest field of engagement and particularly the ability to shoot straight forward or backward which seemed to be the most common attack vectors. This would also give them less deflection to deal with. Next I would think would be the waist gunners who had a great field of view but very tough deflection shots to make typically, I would think. I can't imagine many kills were recorded by the navigator's cheek guns, the original single nose MG, or the radio operator's gun due to the limited field of view/gun traverse in those positions. RE: B-17 crew survey - Michael - 10-10-2006 I am definitely claustrophobic, I don't think I would care to be that confined. Thanks Panther Bait for a good link. RE: B-17 crew survey - Michael - 10-10-2006 I am definitely claustrophobic, I don't think I would care to be that confined. Thanks General for a good link. RE: B-17 crew survey - Montana Mud - 10-10-2006 informative link, Thanks General |
){kind=link}