 |
|
Zemke, still wanting that att/def game? - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Combat Mission (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Zemke, still wanting that att/def game? (/showthread.php?tid=38886) |
Zemke, still wanting that att/def game? - Colonel Talvela - 01-27-2007 Zemke, saw this on fragment Zemke Wrote:Heck I cannot get games from some players on the Blitz, and I am certainly not at the top of the ELO ladder by any means. Although I have beaten several that are, and thus am looked upon as a threat best left alone, or I am to risky to play, because if they win, they gain few ELO points, if they lose, they will lose they ass in ELO points. So the problem I am referring to is at the Blitz now. My ELO would be higher if I played a certain way, or certain players, but I will play anyone, and almost anything, which can lead to some "bad beats", to use a Texas Hold'Em phrase. Which will cause a drop in your ELO rating, but as I don't really care about my personnel ELO rating, it has caused some problems geting games with certain un-named players. I assumed you might have been talking about me, since you had challenged me to that att/def game. and just so you know, if you were posting about me, that doesnt bother me. I rarely take things personal - especially if they have some truth to them. However, I will defend my honor to you and say that had you challenged me based on ELO I would have certainly accepted. Only 1 person has ever done that and I accepted. Other than that I just play for fun or in tourneys, but I do try to play balanced games against good opponents. Anyway, no hard feelings on my part if you were referring to me. I just dont want it said - or even thought - of me that I backed down because I was scared to lose ELO points. Because that isnt true - although I will admit that I do care about my ELO - but not to the point where I would hide from a game to keep it high. So let me know. Top Level Match, Huckelberry Time - Zemke - 01-28-2007 RE: Top Level Match, Huckelberry Time - Colonel Talvela - 01-28-2007 Zemke Wrote:Propose a 3000pt Assault, Med Map, small hills, med woods, 60+ turns, I will attack or defend, CMBB Aug 1944, one picks the side, the other picks to attack or defend. Well you know my opinion about att games & time limits. for me 40+ turns would be a long time for the attacker on a 3000 pt assault. Heck, I would rather be an attacker with 40+ turns than the defender with 50+ turns - not to mention 60. So I will be the attacker - and you pick the side and the game. RE: Zemke, still wanting that att/def game? - Zemke - 01-28-2007 Sounds Good. Lets see what you can do with all that time. RE: Zemke, still wanting that att/def game? - Colonel Talvela - 01-29-2007 send the setup to dkchapuis (at) yahoo dot com |
){kind=link}