 |
|
Alt Bulge44 oob question - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tiller Operational Campaigns (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: Alt Bulge44 oob question (/showthread.php?tid=39897) |
Alt Bulge44 oob question - sergio - 04-01-2007 RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - Tanker Mike - 04-01-2007 RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - Rev Rico - 04-01-2007 From what I gather the 560 did have more JgPz IV/70 but it also had JgPz Vs. Delivery records indicate the following going to that unit Oct-44 - 4 Nov-44 - 5 Dec-44 - 4 I don't know VM's rationale for only have JgPzIVs. He may have more detailed info or it was a typo. Bob RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - Volcano Man - 04-02-2007 Actually the battalion was a mix, 2 kompanie Jgpz IV and 1 kompanie Jgpanther. I think I accidentally made the 3rd kompanie Jgpz IV as well. I will fix it. RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - bdtj1815 - 04-03-2007 I think you will find that it was the first company equipped with Jagdpanthers, with 17 on strength but only 15 battle ready on the 16th according to Dugdale. RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - Volcano Man - 04-03-2007 That may be true but I am only matching it up with the stock OOB's decision. My mistake was that I did not include a Jagdpanther company at all. I think the difference between it being the 1st or the 3rd kompanie is minimal considering the amount of work that would have to be done to fix that in the game (all the scenarios containing these units would require splitting the 1st and 2nd kompanies apart because they are joined at start, otherwise you would have a two kompanies of different type mixed with it taking the type of the 1st kompanie and no one would split them because of that). RE:��Alt Bulge44 oob question - sergio - 04-04-2007 Volcano Man Wrote:I think the difference between it being the 1st or the 3rd kompanie is minimal considering the amount of work that would have to be done to fix that in the game (all the scenarios containing these units would require splitting the 1st and 2nd kompanies apart because they are joined at start, otherwise you would have a two kompanies of different type mixed with it taking the type of the 1st kompanie and no one would split them because of that). what you say, VM, happen if you directly change the unit type of the 1st co from JgpzIV to JgPzV. But you can change the unit name of the 1st co to 3rd co. then the 3rd co to 1st co and jgpzIV type to jgpzV. doing so you're able to include jgpzV also changing the unit's name. I have tried myself and it works fine. BUT, doing so, if you have very detailed info about the hex where the 1st or 3rd jgpz560 was in then they will be reversed. I hope that this could help if this is understandable :S [attachment=964] [attachment=966] RE: Alt Bulge44 oob question - Volcano Man - 04-04-2007 Ok, I just did it. It should be in the next update. |
){kind=link}