Vehicle or Armor - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Combat Mission (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +---- Forum: CM Tactical Discussion (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +---- Thread: Vehicle or Armor (/showthread.php?tid=41262) |
Vehicle or Armor - Andre - 07-04-2007 I notice that PSW 234/2, 234/3, 234/4 and the Lynx in CMBB are listed in Armor folder, in CMAK only the Lynx. I think that's definitively wrong they are all Reconnaissance Vehicles and must be listed in the Vehicles folder. What's your view on this subject RE: Vehicle or Armor - Nort - 07-04-2007 Personally, I would put the Lynx in the armor catagory because it has treads. I would put the cars in the vehicle catagory because they have wheels. Just my two cents. RE: Vehicle or Armor - Copper - 07-04-2007 Yeah I go with Norts assessment. RE: Vehicle or Armor - Andre - 07-04-2007 ok I can comprehend to differentiate between treads and wheels, but if I would differentiate like this what is with the Allies Kangaroo and Wasp they have treads too. And it's not historical correct, not a problem if you play Force Mix = Unrestricted but if you play Force Mix = Combined Arms my favorite or Mechanized there is one option less to choose. And an Allies Staghound III with an Valentine turret 75mm L/38 is more like an tank as an Puma. Sad to say but we will get no patch for this :mad: |