 |
|
Have an Idea; - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Combat Mission (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Have an Idea; (/showthread.php?tid=51642) |
Have an Idea; - Soldier - 06-06-2009 Checking out the many good stock scenarios in the Scenario Database, noticed just how many of them been hardly played. Here's one for an example; "Chaos in the Ardennes." Played twice, both games resulting in a victory for the German side. Problem obviously is, an unbalanced scenario. My idea is to remake such scenarios, with a few changes to the weaker side of course and up load them to H2H for official play testing next. My question is, would it be legal to do, to a Stock Scenario? Original title would be slightly changed with a simple ad on word like "revised, rebalanced or upgraded, etc.. :-) Would this be acceptable by H2H rules also? RE: Have an Idea; - Mr Grumpy - 06-06-2009 Yes as long as you slightly change the title by adding "Alternate" or "H2H" or "Balanced" etc and add some text explaining this is a Approved scenario to the briefing/description as you suggest, that will be fine! :) We must leave the original scenario unaltered and treat this one basically like a separate scenario. ;) RE: Have an Idea; - Soldier - 06-06-2009 Thanks! Responded to your post in more detail, in H2H.. RE: Have an Idea; - Mr Grumpy - 06-06-2009 Soldier Wrote:Thanks! OK see my reply..... :) RE: Have an Idea; - wigam - 06-06-2009 Good on ya Soldier! :bow: If you need a hand testing let me know. RE: Have an Idea; - Soldier - 06-06-2009 Thanks Wigam! I've started on the example one in my initial post, "Chaos in the Ardennes." Fairly small one by CM standard. I'll have it ready for testing later today. Will send you a copy of the "Chaos in the Ardennes(Revised)" file soon after.. :-) |
){kind=link}