New Campaign Leipzig Scenario - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Black Powder & Cold Steel (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=163) +---- Forum: The Napoleonic Wars (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=165) +---- Thread: New Campaign Leipzig Scenario (/showthread.php?tid=62085)

New Campaign Leipzig Scenario - Sgt_Rock - 06-18-2012 Attached is T7. Battle of Champions. It uses the new Variable Reinforcement Arrival Location feature that came out in Campaign 1814. File goes in main game folder. Uses the large Kulm-Altenberg map. Description: 16 October 1813 - Hypothetical - Intended to be played Head to Head - Using the Altenberg-Kulm map, this scenario has all of the forces arriving at variable locations based on a 5 percent arrival percentage. Both sides begin with some forces on the map. The Allies have a 6,000 man advantage. No two games will ever be the same. The goal is to hold the key victory point locations and take the fewest losses. Will your forces arrive or did they take the wrong turn as they marched to the battlefield? (note: ignore text that says "all of the forces" - there ARE some forces on the map to begin with - I meant to say "all of the reinforcements" instead) RE: New Campaign Leipzig Scenario - Compass Rose - 06-18-2012 It sounds like the new Variable Reinforcement Arrival Location feature will add some more excitement to the already entertaining NAP series. Thanks for offering the extra scenario! RE: New Campaign Leipzig Scenario - Compass Rose - 06-19-2012 T7. Battle of Champions has now been uploaded to the Blitz Data Base and can be found within the Leipzig scenario listings on page seven, which is located here: https://www.theblitz.club/scenarios/Black-Powder/T7.-Battle-of-Champions/action=scenario_details&sid=1294&ladder=7 Attached below is the updated file that now includes the corrected description, that was noted to in the 1st post.