• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads
Forums
EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - Printable Version

+- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards)
+-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tiller Operational Campaigns (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating (/showthread.php?tid=68439)

EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - ComradeP - 09-07-2015

A number of artillery units have a rating of 12 instead of 14, possibly carried over from an earlier version.

The 10.5cm FH98 units with something in their description to indicate their composition have a rating of 12.



Festung Koenigsberg, Fussartillerie-det. Koenigsberg (as an aside, most of the Festung Koenigsberg artillery units also have a replacement value, unlike other gun units):

II.ResFussAR.1 (-)

Fussartillerie-det 8:

II./GResFussAR.2 (-)
II./ResFussAR.17 (both units)

Hauptreserve Posen, Art.det.Posen:

I./ResFussAR.5 (-)

RE: EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - BigDuke66 - 09-07-2015

Could it be that the different versions of the "10.5 cm Feldhaubitze 98" are simulated?
That gun had an updated version called "10.5 cm Feldhaubitze 98/09" with a new recoil mechanism and a new carriage, maybe that is why the rating is higher on some.

RE: EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - ComradeP - 09-07-2015

That's possible, the older version might've had a lower rate of fire, which could've been abstracted into a lower SA rating.

RE: EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - Volcano Man - 09-08-2015

To be sure, what are the exact component names (not unit names) of the artillery units that have different ratings?

RE: EP '14 different 10.5cm FH98 SA rating - Volcano Man - 09-08-2015

Ah never mind - I was worried about overlooking one of them but there doesn't seem to be many.

Yes, these are a typo actually. At some point in the past the FH 98 values were corrected from a calculation error, but I must of missed a few. I also noticed that a few of these are also wrong in the Lodz and 2nd Masurian Lakes OOB so I fixed those as well for the next update. Thanks for pointing them out. :)