CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - Printable Version

CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - Printable Version

+- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards)
+-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Combat Mission x2 (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=221)
+--- Thread: CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought (/showthread.php?tid=69499)

CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - burroughs - 04-16-2016

Closed: thank you.

As per thread subject - I'd like to do the two attack / defence scenario set in a row, playing as the Allied side. Level elite, I'd say that after a year with CMX2 + Modern I am somewhere between average to medium quality player. Turns down to one or two a week, I won't service anything faster due to other commitments I have just rearranged. Mail me or answer here if interested or need to know more, I'll get in touch then. Dropbox served.

RE: CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - weapon2010 - 04-18-2016

I will happily be your axis opponent in both

RE: CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - burroughs - 04-18-2016

Thanks, but by the time you answered I had already found an opponent. Besides I wouldn't offer a mirror match or switch sides afterwards anyway.

RE: CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - weapon2010 - 04-19-2016

I wasn't suggesting that is the only way I would play you, may I ask why you would not switch sides?

RE: CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - burroughs - 04-23-2016

Yeah, sorry for the belated reply - the reason is the fog of war. Otherwise it's much like playing chess which is a game of calculations so I don't play chess not being a human computer in a direct meaning of the term. A field commander even on a tactical level rarely ever has a full access to the OpFor characteristics. Of course , the other thing is what is being done with that, but still Monty didn't inspect Heeresgruppe "B" in detail prior to Market-Garden. Actually quite opposite - he refused to give credit to reconnaissance and intelligence reports with a well-known result.
That sort of reason ... even though the example is from operational to strategic level.

RE: CLOSED:CM tFB Battle for Chaumont Axis oponent sought - weapon2010 - 04-25-2016

(04-23-2016, 06:21 PM)burroughs Wrote: Yeah, sorry for the belated reply - the reason is the fog of war. Otherwise it's much like playing chess which is a game of calculations so I don't play chess not being a human computer in a direct meaning of the term. A field commander even on a tactical level rarely ever has a full access to the OpFor characteristics. Of course , the other thing is what is being done with that, but still Monty didn't inspect Heeresgruppe "B" in detail prior to Market-Garden. Actually quite opposite - he refused to give credit to reconnaissance and intelligence reports with a well-known result.
That sort of reason ... even though the example is from operational to strategic level.

no problem, I actually agree with you, I don't like mirror matches in scenarios (qb's are a different story) while they are going on simultaneously, but I do enjoy revisting and taking the otherside after some time has gone by.