The Official World in Flames Tournament RULES CHANGE Poll

[Ashcloud]

Please vote over a RULES change:

Keep:
ALL rules ON except EA and VV OFF. (Unless, of course, a scenario is explicitly balanced for certain rules)

Change:
ALL rules ON except AF and VV OFF. (Unless, of course, a scenario is explicitly balanced for certain rules)

PLEASE NOTE: The result of this poll will determine the rules for all new scenarios assigned from the day the poll ends - please vote, the poll will run for 14 days.

[Crossroads]

Please vote over a RULES change:

Keep:
ALL rules ON except EA and VV OFF. (Unless, of course, a scenario is explicitly balanced for certain rules)

Change:
ALL rules ON except AF and VV OFF. (Unless, of course, a scenario is explicitly balanced for certain rules)

I vote for the latter.

[Big Ivan]

I vote for keep it as is, EA & VV off.

ItB

[Otto von Blotto]

I am not bothered and will play with the rules suggested by the majority so will not be voting.

[Crossroads]

The idea I had in the beginning of tournament was that we'd play scenarios we'd normally perhaps not choose, from all Theatres of War, with optional rules we'd perhaps not choose either.

One of the ideas I had was even to play without FOW and without C&C, to make it appear more like a board game with all counters visible (Indirect fire by map OFF of course), and having the same weight with their punches regardless of where in the map they were

I will absolutely play by the rules set up by the tournament moderator as well. It is not a big thing for me.

[Oberst]

I select option 1.

[Dan Caviness]

I vote for option 1.
EA and VV off.
I like armor facing.

[Askari19]

I'd vote for keeping the original rules, EA and VV off.

I like EA on its merits, but it has an enormous impact on play balance in scenarios that were not designed for its use.

I'm flexible on AF, but after months of fighting wildly ahistorical concentrations of PzV and PzVI, I fret about how to handle them if they have no flanks!

[fastphil]

As is is fine with me.

[Ashcloud]

Results seem pretty conclusive.