Extreme assault or not

[Remko van den Berg]

although I voted "yes" , think that assaulting with EA is to difficult
If I manage to disrupt the opponent then I rather keep on shooting then to assault. shooting is more effective , unless the disrupted unit is artillery or a lonely leader

[Glint]

although I voted "yes" , think that assaulting with EA is to difficult
If I manage to disrupt the opponent then I rather keep on shooting then to assault. shooting is more effective , unless the disrupted unit is artillery or a lonely leader

I wholeheartedly agree with that. I very rarely attempt assaults, with EA in action, unless it 'feels right'. Much prefer shooting the enemy apart!

[Skryabin]

(and only if) the scenario was designed for it's use. Older scenarios should never be played with EA on

Sounds reasonable and it seems like a graet idea to be considered in testing and scenario info in future.

[Artur]

I would like to play a bit with JTCS and I believe it is good to know whether to play with or without it as it makes a totally different game.

You have not reported any games in quite a while? JTCS is a totally different game from Steel Panthers.
Let us know when you join the CS Ladder? :chin:



HSL

I would love to... But my busy schedule prevents me from any serious wargaming commitment.

I'll play a bit against AI and then we shall see. Thanks for the invitation anyway, once it will be possible you will be the first to know ;)

Artur.

[Otto von Blotto]

I'll play a bit against AI and then we shall see.

Now that's a whole new can of worms :cool2: I would advise using EA against the AI. I feel it does make it a tougher opponent and adds some spice to solo games.