08-04-2014, 03:49 AM,
|
|
Wargamer
Private 1st Class
|
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
Opponent wanted
I am looking for an opponent to play a game. I have all the Napoleonic games except Leipzig. I am not a fast player but I can manage 1-2 turns a week. I prefer to play without house rules.
|
|
08-04-2014, 03:59 AM,
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Sounds promising, I'm not particularly fast either.
I am comfortable without house rules.
What optional rules do you like to have set ON?
I have HPS Waterloo and Eckmuhl. What title/scenario do you fancy?
|
|
08-04-2014, 09:33 AM,
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
(08-04-2014, 03:49 AM)Wargamer Wrote: I have all the Napoleonic games except Leipzig.
Hope Leipzig is on your "To Get" list as I highly recommend it.
From my POV it is the the most enjoyable JTS NAP title to be released (BTW, my favorite HPS NAP title is Waterloo). For me, it has a different feel to it (in a good way), when compared to playing the other JTS NAP titles. From what I understand it was play-tested more than any of the other JTS NAP titles, and it shows!
|
|
08-04-2014, 11:47 PM,
|
|
Wargamer
Private 1st Class
|
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Hi Compass Rose,
Thanks for your information. Leipzig is on my list.
Cheers,
Marco
(08-04-2014, 09:33 AM)Compass Rose Wrote: (08-04-2014, 03:49 AM)Wargamer Wrote: I have all the Napoleonic games except Leipzig.
Hope Leipzig is on your "To Get" list as I highly recommend it.
From my POV it is the the most enjoyable JTS NAP title to be released (BTW, my favorite HPS NAP title is Waterloo). For me, it has a different feel to it (in a good way), when compared to playing the other JTS NAP titles. From what I understand it was play-tested more than any of the other JTS NAP titles, and it shows!
|
|
08-05-2014, 01:26 AM,
|
|
Wargamer
Private 1st Class
|
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Hi Eckerslyke,
Perhaps we can play A03. Approaching Abensberg with me playing the Austrians ?
I normally play with everything checked except: Manual Defensive Fire, Partial Retreats, Line Movement restriction, Multiple Infantry Melees.
Regards,
Marco
(08-04-2014, 03:59 AM)Eckerslyke Wrote: Sounds promising, I'm not particularly fast either.
I am comfortable without house rules.
What optional rules do you like to have set ON?
I have HPS Waterloo and Eckmuhl. What title/scenario do you fancy?
|
|
08-05-2014, 02:13 AM,
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Hello Wargamer, thanks for your response.
You wrote,
Perhaps we can play A03. Approaching Abensberg with me playing the Austrians ?
Well, I tend to like larger maps and longer scenarios than the one you suggest, because I feel it allows scope for more inventiveness (and disastrously harebrained schemes, it must be admitted).
In the A03 scenario, the impression I get is that the two sides are pretty much doomed to slug it out from where they stand. Is there a larger map and longer scenario in the same genre which might appeal to you?
I would be happy to play either side, BTW.
Among the optional rules you suggest, I note that you would have 'multiple cavalry melees' set ON. I've been discussing this with other denizens of the board, and I confess I still don't get it. I would be very interested to know what advantage (or disadvantage) you feel there might be in having that option set ON. I can't find any explanation about it in my version of the manual. Any light you can shed on why you prefer it set ON would be greatly appreciated.
Apart from that, I would also suggest having the line movement restriction set ON, for realism, although I suspect that would affect the Austrians adversely, to a greater extent than the French.
|
|
08-05-2014, 11:37 AM,
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Hello Marco:
I've found an opponent now, so I won't be able to go through with setting up a battle with you just at present.
Good luck with finding an opponent!
|
|
08-05-2014, 05:27 PM,
|
|
Wargamer
Private 1st Class
|
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
RE: Opponent wanted
Hi William,
No problem. Good luck with your game.
|
|
|