02-17-2009, 06:40 AM,
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
VM,
Thank you for updating this scenario. I do have one observation though. The German artillery gets' their behinds kicked at the start of this scenario as they aren't dug-in.
Was this the case? I find it hard to believe that Ivan was building pill-boxes and bunkers day-in and day-out and the Germans didn't bother to dig ramparts, etc., for their vulnerable artillery.
|
|
02-17-2009, 08:31 AM,
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
Well yes, it if was historical than I say let it be. But I think we're also talking about a major play-balance issue.
|
|
02-17-2009, 08:53 AM,
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2009, 08:57 AM by Volcano Man.)
|
|
Volcano Man
Courage Conquers
|
Posts: 1,748
Joined: Jan 2001
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
I don't see where the Russians can kick the German artillery unit's behinds. The Russians must be firing everything they have at the German engineers to get them to disrupt, in order to delay the German speed in which they clear the minefields and blow holes in the AT ditches as long as possible. If they are firing artillery at German guns then, well, they are ignoring the bigger threat. If you are just opening the scenario file and looking at it though then you will get the wrong impression.
But yes, there is a historic element to this, the Germans had to deploy the guns forward enough to cover their targets for the attack. That said, anything that can be considered "pro-Russian" is desired here as well. The German side isn't the one that needs its hand held at start -- there is no play balance issue here (or at least not a negative one).
|
|
02-17-2009, 10:06 AM,
|
|
Krec
Legend in my own mind
|
Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2003
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
i would love to play gmen,
|
|
02-17-2009, 11:08 PM,
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2009, 05:37 AM by Bushido.)
|
|
Bushido
Warrant Officer
|
Posts: 256
Joined: Oct 2007
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
Gents,
I will follow up this titanic Kursk battle with detailed sit. reports. all of course seen from the glorious Red Army's side.
I will start it at the OPS AAR/DAR Forum.
DT and I will hold a superb turnaround maybe 10+ turns a week.
|
|
02-22-2009, 10:49 AM,
|
|
Krec
Legend in my own mind
|
Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2003
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
i can play, prefer gmen
Krec
|
|
02-27-2009, 04:10 AM,
|
|
James Ward
Master Sergeant
|
Posts: 194
Joined: Jul 2008
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
Wow what a differance! I use to think the Germans had tons of extra engineers but not any more.
|
|
02-27-2009, 07:35 AM,
|
|
Volcano Man
Courage Conquers
|
Posts: 1,748
Joined: Jan 2001
|
|
RE: Kursk '43_Alt updated (14 FEB)
Yeah, no kidding. Take care of those engineer units! :)
|
|
|