Modern Campaigns Tournament
|
12-04-2006, 07:59 AM,
|
|
Tide1
Lieutenant General
|
Posts: 1,532
Joined: Feb 2004
|
|
Modern Campaigns Tournament
Gents the second scenario of the second set along with player matchups for it is now posted on the website LOCK AND LOAD !!!!!
http://home.comcast.net/~tide1/index7.htm
Everyone is taking The Warriors Path. Good Luck To All
Tide1
War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want.William Tecumseh Sherman
|
|
12-16-2006, 04:52 PM,
|
|
Volcano Man
Courage Conquers
|
Posts: 1,748
Joined: Jan 2001
|
|
RE: Modern Campaigns Tournament
Question, we are at the end of our match here and it is a blowout with no chance for my NATO partner. I just got to looking over the NGP scenarios and I noticed that 12_01 (the scenario that you said we should play) says that it is intended for Human vs. AI but there is a 12_01a scenario that says that it is Human vs. Human.
Did you mean for us to play 12_01a instead?
|
|
12-16-2006, 08:42 PM,
|
|
Hadge
Grumpy Old Man
|
Posts: 173
Joined: May 2005
|
|
RE: Modern Campaigns Tournament
Hi
I actually have a lot of sympathy for my NATO opponent in this round - not much challenge in it for the Pact either.
Hav'nt played the H2H version of this scenario - but it has to be better than this - I for one would have no problem with a rematch using the H2H version and null out the original game.
Cheers
Chris
|
|
12-17-2006, 05:51 AM,
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2006, 05:52 AM by Volcano Man.)
|
|
Volcano Man
Courage Conquers
|
Posts: 1,748
Joined: Jan 2001
|
|
RE: Modern Campaigns Tournament
|
|
12-17-2006, 07:05 AM,
|
|
Landser34
Sgt. 0311 USMC
|
Posts: 1,207
Joined: Aug 2003
|
|
RE: Modern Campaigns Tournament
I have already played the scenario as Nato i agree with you Nato doesn't stand a chance 2 brigades against 3 Soviet Divisions with T-64's and Bmps
and a East German Division but i played it so i guess i'll live with it
|
|
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)