"
The quality criteria of the H2H section and that of the 1.05 development team are not the same thing"
Yikes, smugness is one thing, this is in it's own category, eh?
So, the "team" is going to maintain the "purity" of the game?
The "select few" looking upon the meager offerings of the "riff raff"?
"
Nonetheless it is good to try to deliver quality scenarios for the patch"
After playing numerous stock scenarios and finding them wanting, some with the simplest of map errors, I think that adding scenarios from the H2H "Blitz approved" area would at least give players more?
The last batch of scenarios included in the last upgrade were all not of the highest caliber either. Everyone knows what I think of most of Huib's scenarios. At least the earlier ones.
===>Believe me, this is not about what I think of Huib or his scenarios. <===
What the game needs is more scenarios, graphics updates, bug fixes, a better AI, and a sooner release of the upgrade to keep up current player interest.
In the area of scenarios Earl removes all of them from his game folders. I remove a "select" few. None of us would remove graphics updates, icon fixes, bug fixes, a better AI, or any other thing that improves the game?
I'd like more input from the players than to be dictated to by an "elite" team who want to put in what they want. Especially with the attitude of "we know what is best". Bleh!
HSL