11-09-2016, 03:02 AM,
|
|
raz_atoth
General
|
Posts: 3,313
Joined: Jun 2005
|
|
Scenario of the Month: November 2016
Greetings gentlemen,
The CMx2 Blitz ladder is testing each month a couple of scenarios. The goal is to determine how well balanced they are for H2H play. The scenarios tested this month are:
CMBN: A Royal Pain *
CMFB: Battle for Chaumont - First Round
* Requires the CW module
If interested, please post here specifying which of the above scenarios you wish to playtest.
For those of you unfamiliar on how the SotM works, you can see the guidelines here:
https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/s...?tid=68690
|
|
11-09-2016, 03:23 AM,
|
|
M.J.H.
Private
|
Posts: 24
Joined: Apr 2016
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
(11-09-2016, 03:02 AM)raz_atoth Wrote: Greetings gentlemen,
The CMx2 Blitz ladder is testing each month a couple of scenarios. The goal is to determine how well balanced they are for H2H play. The scenarios tested this month are:
CMBN: A Royal Pain *
CMFB: Battle for Chaumont - First Round
* Requires the CW module
If interested, please post here specifying which of the above scenarios you wish to playtest.
For those of you unfamiliar on how the SotM works, you can see the guidelines here:
https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/s...?tid=68690
|
|
11-09-2016, 03:26 AM,
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2016, 12:53 AM by M.J.H..)
|
|
M.J.H.
Private
|
Posts: 24
Joined: Apr 2016
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
Hello all,
Please sign me up for both scenarios if you don't mind.
As a side note, this SOTM is a great event - not only allowing us to fight it out on maps we may not have tried with different opponents - but also I have found the rankings and comments this generates are very helpful, and add a lasting resource to go back to and reference.
Thanks very much for putting these together!
MH
|
|
11-09-2016, 03:37 AM,
(This post was last modified: 11-09-2016, 03:41 AM by marco2marzo.)
|
|
marco2marzo
Private 1st Class
|
Posts: 35
Joined: May 2011
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
(11-09-2016, 03:02 AM)raz_atoth Wrote: Greetings gentlemen,
The CMx2 Blitz ladder is testing each month a couple of scenarios. The goal is to determine how well balanced they are for H2H play. The scenarios tested this month are:
CMBN: A Royal Pain *
CMFB: Battle for Chaumont - First Round
* Requires the CW module
If interested, please post here specifying which of the above scenarios you wish to playtest.
For those of you unfamiliar on how the SotM works, you can see the guidelines here:
https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/s...?tid=68690 i am interested in any of the two scenarios
marco
|
|
11-09-2016, 04:42 AM,
|
|
a1steaks
Technical Sergeant
|
Posts: 109
Joined: May 2012
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
I'll play both.
|
|
11-09-2016, 05:04 AM,
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
This sounds great! Please sign me up for both scenarios. Thx
|
|
11-09-2016, 05:22 AM,
|
|
Mad Mike
First Sergeant
|
Posts: 214
Joined: May 2011
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
CMBN please.
As a side note: The first Chaumont battle in CMFB is very unbalanced. Just played it from both sides, the only way to win this as a German player would be when your opponent disappears and you can claim a victory.
|
|
11-09-2016, 06:27 AM,
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
Sign me up for both please.
|
|
11-09-2016, 06:58 AM,
|
|
zinzan1963
Technical Sergeant
|
Posts: 105
Joined: Feb 2015
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
Both for me please.
I'd like to second M.J.H. appreciation for SOM, I prefer scenarios or campaign battles to QB's as I like handling troops that I haven't cherry picked.
"But I don't want to see CM's code or any games code. That is like seeing your spouse and your love as hormones and neurons firing in various lobes on PET scans. Some things should just be enjoyed for what they are; and not analyzed any further.
|
|
11-09-2016, 09:11 AM,
|
|
Guardsman
Sergeant
|
Posts: 61
Joined: Mar 2014
|
|
RE: Scenario of the Month: November 2016
Sign me up for both please
|
|
|