Jorg, wasn't that why they implemented the ELO rating column? There are those who even now do not want it, or know what it is for. :smoke:
A player who won a lot of games, or another who lost games, to "good players" would have a higher ELO rating?
If you want to know who is munching on guppies, at a glance, take a look at the ELO ratings? ;)
I, too, have been playing opponents who are much better than I. After a while they all seem better than I. :rolleyes:
:thumbs_up: You make many good points though!
We will look into adding the "modern eastern armies" to our CS ladder.
Back to your original point. Do you know how many members had more points than were needed to acheive Marshal's rank?
Do you know, even now, that the person that is highest in score on the overall ladder has the Marshal rank by over 2,000 points. That is with the rank being ten times higher to reach.
And, when the owner of the club says to do it? Ya do it? Right?:chin:
We can come back to this discussion after you all read the next issue of the Newsletter? I don't want to stifle any creative thoughts on any other subjects but, we volunteer to do this "work", and we were discussing scoring/Table of Ranks?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
