RE: Dry as a Bone, Part 2
Hello Scott;
I'm sorry you feel the Blitz has become such an "unfair" place. We try our best to meet every one's expectations, but with a few thousand members and hundreds of active posters, we acknowledge that we can't please everyone all of the time.
Banning has never been a matter of public discussion in the past. As mentioned previously, most people can not even recall some of the banned players, let alone explain why they were banned. Some are obvious why, like Black Wolf, others neither obvious or known, like Dan Payne. But any "knowledge" that exists about these bannings is not gleaned because the staff posted a list of charges in the forum, but because it either was painfully obvious to everyone, or people talk.
In the end, we do what we feel we must to run the Blitz the way the owners wish it run. If the owners disagree they merely have to ask us to step down and we will do so. As for the general membership, they must deal with the Custodian from their community. If they disagree they can appeal to Randy, then me, then Jim. Failing that they can vote with their keyboards by not coming to the Blitz. But we're not going to change the way the Club is run because any one individual player feels he's entitled to something he was never offered or promised when he became a member, namely you have no right to know the details of business that is conducted between the club and another member.
regards;
Paul
|