HQ: Rule Change Consideration

Thread Modes

HQ: Rule Change Consideration

10-09-2006, 03:36 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-09-2006, 03:40 AM by CptCav.)

CptCav Offline

Brave Rifles

Posts: 124
Joined: Aug 2001

RE: HQ: Rule Change Consideration

I would like to see the penalty for losing a HQ be the disruption of all units assigned. Furthermore, they could not become undisrupted until a replacement HQ came on to the map.

In the case of a superior HQ being eliminated, I would have all subordinate HQ's be hit with a OUT OF COMMAND penalty until a replacement HQ showed up.

Regards,
CptCav

PS, I like what I am reading on the new command rules change being implemented.

Edmund Burke (1729-1797): "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Ronald Reagan: “Détente: isn’t that what a farmer has with his turkey until Thanksgiving Day?”