• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Bulge '44 scenarios feedback
11-23-2006, 11:43 AM,
#5
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback
Sorry had Blitz page problems.
Dark Winter was more purely my oob. Although the 1k/hex scale cries out for detail, I think if Army Group commanders are mucking around with batalion tactics, unplayable monsters can be created. Problems and tradeoffs, playabilty vs detail, the scenario designer's headache. I kicked around the arty observer idea, and rejected it as well.
Before Dark Winter went "to the press" I noticed an oob mistake. 2 and 3 US armored divs are represented inaccurately, with an extra m4 tank company per batalion. Got in there, anyway. I've been also wrestling with ways to include jumbos and m4 76s, given the combine/breakdown game system restraints and lack of specific information.
If you think the U.S. has no chance in dark winter, get aload of that Wacht am Rhein scenario, where no U.S. engineers can build bridges...lol
Warren
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by FM WarB - 11-22-2006, 11:36 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by Rev Rico - 11-23-2006, 03:24 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by FM WarB - 11-23-2006, 05:59 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by FM WarB - 11-23-2006, 05:59 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by FM WarB - 11-23-2006, 11:43 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by Rev Rico - 11-23-2006, 01:17 PM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by Kuriltai - 11-23-2006, 02:04 PM
U.S. "heavy" armored divisions. - by FM WarB - 11-24-2006, 12:10 AM
RE: U.S. "heavy" armored divisions. - by Rev Rico - 11-24-2006, 03:16 AM
Jumbos and M4 76s - by FM WarB - 11-24-2006, 12:36 AM
RE: Bulge '44 scenarios feedback - by FM WarB - 11-24-2006, 05:08 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)