If you test this way don't test at all

[Valor]

Gentlemen,

As I see I went on duty officer for a few days and I missed such a discussion!

But being serious, I see the Huib's point, as well as the points taken by other posters. Me think that we are touching pretty difficult question. Why do we play CS?

One say that he loves historical scenarios. The other say that he just love the game, with it's possibilities, mix of units etc. And I say that both are right. That is the strength of our beloved game.

Going back to H2H Productions. It's a volunteer based idea. Voulunteers from which some of them prefer to have scenarios as historically accurate as possible, the others just want to spend some their valuable free time on playing new scens and giving something to our community. And for sure, the strict-historical-designer will get little feedback from the game-playablity-fan playtester. And vice versa!

Huib, I really love to play your scenarios. "Dutch Verdun" and "The Grim Road to Hoogerheide" are among the best I ever played :bow: But I also like to play from time to time a "what if" scenario.

Huib, I understand that some (or even most) of the playest reports you've received doesn't meet your criteria of playtest report, but give those people some credit. They also gave their time, their energy, but maybe just are focused on different things... At the end it's up to you whether you'll include their suggestions or not!

Of course with current awerage rating system, one very negative report can ruin all chances to pass through the testing. I hope that it will be changed, as we already proposed in one of our previous discussions.

Once again, gentlemen. Please do not allow the passion to overcome the arguments.

We all love playing the same game!

Slawek