• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Can we go back?
04-10-2007, 06:58 AM,
#7
RE: Can we go back?
My proposals within the officer barracks is below.


Guys would it be possible to make this change.

When a game is reported the player has the option of issuing a balance rating. Eg. 4 = Balanced scenario.

In the scenario section where you can look at the history of the scenario the balance rating is displayed as such.

Average Balance Rating = 4.00

Now this means nothing to me ( I know what it means but new members etc will not be able to associate 4 with Balanced)... can we not just have Average Balance Rating = Well Balanced.

This will provide the information mcuh easier than having a number that doesnt have a 'key' to show what it means.

[Image: Untitled.jpg]


So instead of the number we will have the same as the people say when they post their game result. ie... pro Axis etc.

Also whats the difference between...

How entertaining/challenging is this scenario? (Mark 1-10)

And...

Please rate the scenario? (Mark 1-5 Stars)

You can garner that information from one of the options surely. I mean your not gonna enjoy playing the scenario and then give it a bad score for design and vice versa. Im easy either way and it is just a proposal but i do think there should be some clearer lines of definition between the two.



Thanks.

Bootie


Note: I do appreciate the feedback to designers but I feel there could be a better way of presenting all this. If it can be discussed we may be able to sort out the bugs and improve upon what is their at present.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Can we go back? - by Von Earlmann - 04-09-2007, 10:32 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by RedDevil - 04-09-2007, 10:56 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Huib Versloot - 04-09-2007, 07:44 PM
RE: Can we go back? - by Von Earlmann - 04-10-2007, 03:04 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Huib Versloot - 04-10-2007, 04:30 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Jason Petho - 04-10-2007, 06:38 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Copper - 04-10-2007, 06:58 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Digger - 04-10-2007, 10:52 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by K K Rossokolski - 04-10-2007, 11:09 AM
RE:��Can we go back? - by Mike Abberton - 04-11-2007, 12:17 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by majog - 04-11-2007, 02:00 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by RedDevil - 04-11-2007, 04:03 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Huib Versloot - 04-11-2007, 05:40 AM
RE:��Can we go back? - by Copper - 04-11-2007, 07:31 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Digger - 04-11-2007, 03:55 PM
RE:��Can we go back? - by Jason Petho - 04-12-2007, 01:14 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by The Rattler - 04-11-2007, 06:28 PM
RE: Can we go back? - by RedDevil - 04-12-2007, 01:23 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by majog - 04-12-2007, 01:32 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by RedDevil - 04-12-2007, 01:49 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by junk2drive - 04-12-2007, 01:53 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Valor - 04-12-2007, 07:56 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by Digger - 04-12-2007, 11:24 AM
RE:��Can we go back? - by Jason Petho - 04-13-2007, 01:26 AM
RE: Can we go back? - by K K Rossokolski - 04-12-2007, 01:56 PM
RE: Can we go back? - by Hobbes - 04-18-2007, 11:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)