PoorOldSpike Wrote:Koen Wrote:POS, you're changing the subject again...
do you agree with my terms?
Of course not, unless you come up with some better params..:)
I can smell a phoney setup a mile off.. :)
I was tricked once before in the Onion Wars and I'm not falling for it again..;)
It was about 3 years ago, I joined OW and said to my team leaders -"I specialise in lightning armoured assaults, keep assigning me to battles in critical sectors and i'll give you the enemy capital within weeks".
But what did the dickheads do? - they assigned me to a tiny all-infantry backwater (Stoffel later admitted they did it 'to teach me a lesson') so I called them rednecks, they called me an old fart, and I walked..:)
The last I heard, 3 years later they still hadn't captured the enemy capital.. :)
POS, what is the purpose of that story? That I can't be trusted?
This is not something that happened in the past, this is not them.
This is me who was going to ask MR to give us a well balanced realistic historical battle.
And, as I wrote here before, with mixed forces.
So nothing you wrote here above matters.
MR builds, me and another judge check it out and you get a set-up file so blind game for both players.
K:stir: