RE: H2H approved scenario - Winter Dawn
I give up man!
Tried real hard explaining to you that you can not guarantee a blind game, unless it's QBs and or some tournament games, as pointed out by Mad Russian.
So in reality, the best think is to agree that both players study the maps and force size and make up, on both sides. Only now you have a truly balanced player approach to the game. Just like in Chess and that is why I equated these type of games to it.
After all Chess is the only perfectly balanced game, from terrain and force size, make up perspective.
You can't prove that this type of a game, is less balanced verses an "alleged" blind game, etc..
In fact the opposite is true!
Can you be absolutely certain that your opponent was honest and did not look over your side of the scenario?
I can not be sure that my opponent did study both sides of the scenario, after I asked him, told him, instructed him to do so either. But I don't really care. Because I did give him the option to do so, therefore if he chooses not to, I'm not the one unbalancing the game. I'm I? :-)
|