|
RE: Which counts more ...
Hawk:
I agree that the public has a right to comment. I will not take a stance at this time as to what if Panther is being fair. The bottom line to me was he asked for opinions and received lots. Ziess was never told he had to replay the turn by either myself or Panther, he volunteered it as a more than fair show of sportsmanship that reflect well of himself and should define him as an exemplary opponent.
On the other hand Panther has still not publicly stated if he will take that option or just continue as is. Panther went to this formum for a public opinion and probably got a bit more than bargained for. As stated I could easily way in and stated the turn must continue as is and not be replayed but to what point. They have reach a comprimise amonst themselves and neither formally complained to me. I think with them both being European and there being possible language issues that a clarification of the rules was asked for and very clearly given. As part of that Zeiss willingly stepped to the plate and stated ok even though I am within the rules I think maybe something was misunderstood by either or both of us and here is what I propose. Again that states more about him than any of us ever could. As the tourney host I chose to let it be at that?
Why was that wrong?
|
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
