alaric99x Wrote:On the thread that introduced you, it says you were in 4-67. If I remember correctly, the 67th was at Ft. Hood, as part of 2AD, at the same time I was there. I was in 2d FSB (Forward Support Bn) at that time, in '84 and '85. I always enjoyed going out to the ranges there and watching tank gunnery, what an impressive show that was! ...and the creativity of the names on the tank gun tubes, what's on your tank now?
That might very well be the case, some time in the early 90s or so I think 2AD was deactivated and the reshuffled the Regt designations around. In 97 or so it changed from 4-67 AR to 1-37 AR. My last tank (in A/1-37 AR) was "Armored Death" or something like that. Alpha company always had it easy to come up with tank names because we figured out that all you had to do is put "Armored" (not "Armoured" Foul :)) in front of anything. "Armored Hobo" for example. ;)
alaric99x Wrote:Now to the actual question: I'm still new at PzC and working my way through the France '40 campaign, on turn 45 now, and using your alt scenario. There's one division headquarters unit floating around toward the north that doesn't have any subordinate units attached. I assume you put that there in order to allow for attachments from other units. I just want to ask if this is correct and if you have any other recommendations about what should be done with this HQ.
I am not familiar with that HQ unit, it must be something from the stock game. If it is indeed a Div HQ with no units then it wouldn't have any real effect on attachements. If it was a corps HQ then I would say that it was indeed added so that you could attach units to it and expand your command. Not sure why a lone Div HQ would appear though.
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}