A question of accuracy

[Mr Grumpy]

I personally have no problem with players questioning any aspect of a scenario as long as the comments are constructive rather than just negative, these games will never be 100% accurate in everything they portray and as FLG says playability has to included in the mix. :rolleyes:

We will always find books that will disagree on some point of history, which should be used will always be a tough call, i personally just like to play the games and if the unit i am moving has 18 Panthers when some book says they should have had 22 on this particular day, then i will not lose any sleep over that...............;)

Also i agree with FLG about the editors, four years ago i could not even turn on a PC so if i can do this anybody can IMO, i now regularly use the editors for my H2H scenarios, it is amazing what you can do with them, just reducing a supply source or changing TRENCHES to trenches or changing the quality of units can produce major effects on how a scenario plays, as it happens we are not overrun with players designing/editing scenarios at the moment, so why not give it a try.........:chin: