K K Rossokolski Wrote:Thank you -I too consult F2 regularly, am fully aware of the IG limits (which is why I put up this post) and find this an insufficient reason to limit a weapon's physical capabilities. Are we to assume, even if the doctrinal statement is correct (I confess to personally never having read the original IJA infantry fighting doctrine) that NO Japanese infantry gun was EVER used in the indirect mode??? Come On!!!!!
Does anyone know of any other CS unit that has its physical characteristics constrained by some ALLEGED doctrine?
Can anyone tell me how much their employment of a particular unit in a CS game is based on:
a. knowledge of doctrine pertaining to that unit
b.blind obedience to said doctrine?
:bang:
Cheers
KKR
http://books.google.com/books?id=LfHdpf_...w#PPA22,M1
Here it says it was used for both? Or am I reading about the wrong gun?
Alternatively, I could do the same thing as I have done with the halftacks, create a second set with different firepower characteristics. Of course, they would only work for new scenarios.
Jason Petho