New Scenario - Blocking Action At Lipki

[Bear]

Don't bother.
If it's like his Guderian Attacks or Borisov scenarios, the scenario is worthless. Historically inaccurate and grossly tilted to the Soviet player, despite the fact that the time period portrayed is during the Barbarossa campaign.
Bear likes putting the German player at a distinct disadvantage by setting the OOB as mostly less than Veteran status forces.
The Guderian Attacks scenario suffers from all the German forces being forced to set up and cross two bridges before being able to deploy for battle. The time required to cross and deploy takes between three to five turns out of a thirteen turn scenario.

:censored:

This forum is for Play Testing. If Catastrophe had issue(s) with scenarios play balance and historical relevance. Then I will acknowledge such and make all the necessary reviews and revisions, as I have with both Guderian Attacks and Borisov Bridgehead before Catastrophe "tagged" them as being "worthless".
In addition, I am bewildered to then read "Ratzki" pile on by plugging his scenario as a superior alternative since it is an approved H2H Scenario. Both are obviously "Off Topic" here and out of line criticizing a scenario which neither one has played.
Where is the moderator, can I get a witness?
I appreciate "Foul" and "Mad Russian" supporting this very point.
Some of us believe in the "Club" and the fundamentals of honor, fairness and mutual respect for one another as gamers AND men.
Our focus should be on making the Blitz Club a portal for advancing our hobby by bonding with members and recruiting new ones, no?