glint Wrote:I have to agree with Hawk to some degree. I've built a large scenario for WF with a buddy and were playing it out as a test play. We both play games for fun and we're thouroughly enjoying it and others are interested in trying it.
In the Blitz, it seems that there are some who want historical accuracy, others who want to win at all costs, others who play for the fun, etc., all valid reasons when considering the number of members.
Personally, and I've said this before in a previous post that never got a response, I'll play any scenario offered, in the database out of enjoyment, win or lose, why, as a designer, do I have to go through the process of it being play-tested through H2H for verification of it being 'acceptable'?
There are so many different views on what is enjoyable, as mentioned before, what is the criteria for a 'Quality Scenario'?
This is not posted in a contentious manner, just speaking from the heart!
Peter (Glint)
Hello Peter,
Yes, for your scenario to be considered a blitz "approved" scenario it has to pass through the testing system, i am afraid there is no way round that.
If the players want a section of the club where they can upload untested scenarios to a list, then that is something you will have to ask Red Devil for and is outside my area of responsibility :)
To be honest we are using the testing system over at PzC without the particular problems you mention,however it
does pay to know that your testers are players who will give you top detailed feedback and once again it would be better for a designer to arrange the tests rather than just upload the scenario and allow any players to test it.
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
H2H Seems to be dead.
){kind=link}