RE: H2H Seems to be dead.
I think the H2H as is, is not so bad. The designers just have to be on top of it and try to get their scns through by mobilizing testers.
To simplify things:
I do think a single rate for the overall scenario would be sufficient instead of 3 separate ratings for balance (which nobody can judge), briefings and enjoyment. This could be a rating from 1 to 10 where a couple of ratings of 7 or higher would be sufficient to pass. Or by a question in the testreport: Do you think this scenario has sufficient quality to be approved: yes/no.
|