• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Armour Facing Rules
02-08-2008, 02:52 AM,
#9
RE: Armour Facing Rules
As Cole just said. I also believe a case can be made either way. His examples for such seem pretty good. However if there was to be a move with players wanting to play alot more games with the armor facing rules off, Then IMO I believe the defense values allready provided would warrent some tweeking. For example: Your basic M4 Sherman tank has a defense value of 8, While a King Tigers is 16. IMO a King Tiger provided alot more than twice the overall protection. An attack from the air would be the only exception there.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Armour Facing Rules - by Hobbes - 02-04-2008, 02:59 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by junk2drive - 02-04-2008, 03:06 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Huib Versloot - 02-04-2008, 06:24 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Von Earlmann - 02-04-2008, 09:29 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Jason Petho - 02-04-2008, 09:51 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Chuck10mtn - 02-04-2008, 10:37 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Valor - 02-07-2008, 09:42 PM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Cole - 02-07-2008, 10:57 PM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Jumbo - 02-08-2008, 02:52 AM
RE: Armour Facing Rules - by Herr Straße Laufer - 02-08-2008, 05:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)