Questionnaire for all WF players

[Cole]

I prefer a larger scenario; a la Von Earlmann; as opposed to the smaller ones where a lot depends on the first move or two. A larger scenario one can come back from mistakes, get to know your opponent's play style, and also become more "emotionally" attached to you command.

On the flip side smaller scenarios are needed, especially for online play; of which I am a big fan.

My two cents. Answers to questions below:

Size
1. What is the size of force that you most enjoy in a two-player game?
X = Two Divisions or more (for PBEM)
X = Regiment or below (for Online play)

2. How large of a map do you most enjoy playing?
X = 100x100 hexes or larger (PBEM)
x = Between 30x30 and 60x30 (online)

3 How many turns do you prefer?
X= 10 to 20 (online)
X= 50 or greater (PBEM)

Theatre and Operation Type

4. Which theatre do you most prefer?

X= Netherlands and northern Belgium (would like to see more scenarios with minor allies; thanks Huib. Norway would be a great campaign).

5. What operation type do you prefer?

Armored attack (combined arms)


6. What kind of terrain is your favorite?

Mostly open with some forest and towns
with
Major river


Weapon and Unit Preferences

7. What kind of weapons/forces do you most enjoy playing?
Tanks


8. What type of battle accessories do you prefer most?

Engineers


9. Would you be less likely to enjoy games with wagon transport?

No

10. Which specialty transports would interest you the most?
Pack horses


11. Have you strong objections to having some fixed units, with later releases?

No

Historical Situations

12. What is your preference regarding the scenario’s historical background?
Prefer historically accurate scenarios.

13. Do you like to have many historical officers in the scenario? Choose one.

Historical commanders at battalion level and above. ALONG WITH historical medal winners, Panzer Aces, personalities, etc.