No one likes good scenarios?

[2ndLt_Fjun]

1. you cannot report the game as a standard game, which makes sense in case the scenario is totally lop sided.

Shouldn't the players be able to make that decision? If they agree to play a test scenario, they also know that it could be unbalanced. One solution is to play it mirrored and add the points together from both games, which would balance out most scenarios. I think that would be the easiest way of making the testing of new scenarios more attractive.

There are no restrictions on playing unbalanced games for the ladder for other purposes (there are plenty of unbalanced scenarios that are playable for the ladder, and you could also turn any generated battle into something lopsided by volontarily or unvolontarily picking the wrong settings).

I don't care too much about winning or losing, so I could test a scenario for fun too, but it does add a bit to the excitement to have it recorded as a ladder game. Bonus points are not as fun :)