K K Rossokolski Wrote:I was not aware that The Blitz had a style manual for comment on the MBs....perhaps you would be kind enough to let me have a copy. Nor was I aware that sarcasm is verboten . A lifelong habit, I'm afraid.
Ranting...I think not,..and certainly not carrying the implication of a threat, as your earlier post did. I quote "I personally would be less forgiving and certain more vocal" and "I greatly suggest a different theme or approach." I've seen the elephant, pal, try selling threats elsewhere, we don't need 'em here.
And as for educated critique, I could be forgiven for thinking that a working life in the Navy gives me some right to consider myself educated in naval matters.
Allright Rod,
You have tangled a bit with Ed, Randy has now warned you to tone it done.
Now I am telling you too. You need to cool your jets. All these optional features are being done for
free with
people's free time.
All I have seen from you is complaints with now offer of improvement or solution. This is also not a new behavior for you (you complain about the style of the message board too).
Here is a piece of advice for you.
Don't play the scenarios that have features (naval, on board aircraft, etc) that you don't like.
Also your next attack on the beta brigade or patch 1.03 is going to be moderated.
Come to the table with something constructive.
You may wish to review the Rules of Engagement again to see where you are being out of line.
I hope that is clear for you.
Thanx!