:rolleyes:
Ivan Wrote:Silkster53 Wrote::chin: Too bad. Something in the middle ground may have been acceptable to all parties. :conf:
Silkster, could you say what something in the middle ground would be? We all know about the bugs that a few people have experienced (I haven't as yet). What changes would be acceptable to you in addition to fixing the bugs?
How about one where you have overwhelming odds and the defender would surrender?
Now it must be attacked and assaulted multiple times depending on what terrain and I guess what it's morale is.
I don't care if Batman and Robin are in a hex with their utility belts full of goodies. If they are attacked by well trained men who number in the thousands, and Batman is not a happy camper, the attackers should win.
I've seen this multiple times where one strength point disrupted units are holding out against hundreds and hundreds of attackers who do combinations of shoots and assaults. I've even lost tank platoons that have assaulted with the infantry.
It is not the realism that I would want.
Now if it was Superman I might change my mind. ;)
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
