RE: Complaints about 103
[quote=Silkster53]
I'm the voice that will cry out in the wilderness.
"I do not think a game that has lasted so long without support and very few changes after almost ten years was going to die."
Ed,
The game was not going to die,simply because people like me will play it and work with it. It did not stand the test of time. It went ten years with no changes because Talonsoft deemed it so.There was no one to complain to and no one to change it because they refused to let us use the code or work with us in any way.They took the money and ran as it were. So, if you can call refusing to change anything that a myriad of people wanted fixed standing the test of time: so be it: I have no argument for that.
"I do mind the fundamental change that was done. It changed the game and did not improve it.
Time will tell if it is a change for the better and it brings in a lot more players or returns some of those that left for whatever reason they stopped playing the old game."
I stopped playing the game for a spell because I was burned out. I was very bored with the same old surround,disrupt,herd and capture stuff. I came back,my wife thinks it was a poor choice(see you can't please everyone) but so far I am still enjoying things. I do think it is a bit premature to say the changes did not improve the game....remember Talonsoft let it go for ten years.......I guess I can give the Beta brigade and Matrix a few monthes :-)
Who knows in the end we may have the perfect wargame........:-)
von Earlmann
choice 1 the glass is half full
choice 2 the glass is have empty
The new engineer rules "The container is twice as big as it needs to be"
|