About H2H Section

[Kool Kat]

Chema,

I'll test anything you made, whether it's in H2H section or not.

Thanks Huib, Everybody knows of your great implication in designing tasks.

The problem arise when a scn is ready to test...At this moment, a question appear to designer: Post the scn to H2H section or do it myself?.
A scn tested from H2H area means the scn passed several testing games and it is improved.

I would like to pick a scn from de general scn depot that previosly was in the H2H section... It give me a relative guarantee about playability and fun, but due to minimal activity of the testing section many designers decide to realease to general depot directly. What implication have this fact on the new scn? Players prefer to pick " already played scns" or a new fully tested instead of new ones from a new designer...

This have a serious implication :There are a lot of fantastic scns out there, unplayed, no voted, and finally missing...
I noted that, when a new threat is posted in the forum looking for funny scns :)

Cheers.
Chema

Hi Gents:

Need some advice on testing new scenarios. :chin:

I've been designing a Rising Sun scenario based on the Kokoda Track Campaigns (New Guinea) in 1942. Outnumbered Australian troops, facing an elite Japanese Special Naval Landing Force, fighting a delaying action along the Kokoda Track.

If all goes well, it should be ready for testing in a few weeks!

Should I post the scenario to the H2H section... or just create a post in the general threads and have folks give it a whirl? :conf:

Please let me know.