• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


FASCAM - Gamey or not?
08-18-2008, 11:55 PM,
#8
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not?
Hate the player, not the game! Just kidding folks. Seriously, as I stated in the original post I have no problem with the Disruption aspect of the FASCAM. It is the Isolation [/i][/b] rule that I disagree with in game. FASCAM is a tactical level minefield not an operational minefield. Obstacles of anykind are relatively weak unless combined with observation, direct and indirect fires. FASCAM fired solely by map coordinates will be poorly placed and of minimal value. Unobserved fires tend to be ineffectual. I believe this is just another point stressing the "tactical" aspect of FASCAM.

Tbird3
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Tbird3 - 08-18-2008, 01:10 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Volcano Man - 08-18-2008, 05:36 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Zemke - 08-18-2008, 07:06 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Volcano Man - 08-18-2008, 10:00 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Sgt Fury - 08-18-2008, 02:03 PM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Zemke - 08-18-2008, 04:43 PM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Volcano Man - 08-19-2008, 06:06 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Glenn Saunders - 08-18-2008, 05:15 PM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Zemke - 08-19-2008, 04:06 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Liebchen - 08-19-2008, 05:14 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Zemke - 08-19-2008, 11:57 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Tbird3 - 08-18-2008, 11:55 PM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Liebchen - 08-19-2008, 05:05 AM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Liebchen - 08-19-2008, 12:13 PM
RE: FASCAM - Gamey or not? - by Volcano Man - 08-19-2008, 12:42 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)