• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
11-04-2008, 08:00 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-04-2008, 08:24 AM by JDR Dragoon.)
#9
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
tazaaron Wrote:thanks Dragoon, i will comb through all that info and as for your Questions ill have to answer them later running a little behind have to leave. One Q to you those bridging companies, what did they consist of, pontoons AVLBs?

Aaron

The entire danish army had the princely number of 4 old ex-canadian 2nd hand Centurion AVLBs in the 1980s (both 1985 and 1989). Afaik these were split 50/50 between the Jutland Divisions divisional engineer battalion and the ENG BTN supporting LandZealand (each having 2 Bridgelayers). I am not even sure that 2 Centurion AVLBs even warrants inclusion in the game. So most of the bridgelaying would have been done like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZR6PZ-n328
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85 - by JDR Dragoon - 11-04-2008, 08:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)