Huib Wrote:It's also contra-productive because nobody in the dev team now bothers to listen to him anymore after so many rants.
/H
Well, I would hope that they listen to him because he makes some very good points. To ignore his concerns just because you do not like what he is saying is nothing more than arrogance.
Now as I do not design scenarios, am part of the dev team, or understand all of the 'mechanical” workings behind the software I generally stay out of these arguments as I do not think it is right for me to criticize the hard work put in by others while I offer so little, but this one has been going on long enough and I am coming out to say I fully support Ed's side of this argument.
I still play with the extreme assault rules on and I am trying to like them, but IMHO it has slowed and altered the game to a point that it just seems to have taken some of the enjoyment out of it. I am going to continue to try and adapt to them, but if you tell me I either have to like it or leave it, I will leave it.
I just played a scenario in which a disrupted and surrounded 1SP 37mm AT Gun withstood several assaults for 2 turns (all the while spotting arty down on the Infantry). Now fortunately, the AT gunner was one of my units so I got to laugh and named him John Wayne. Now that's reality?
(Sorry Jason, I thought about sending the turn to you, but ended up deleting the file. Any future incidents I will forward to you.)
I appreciate everyones hard work to make this a more enjoyable game, but if we do not hear and take into consideration all sides of the argument, then the few grognards that still play the CS series will become fewer.
Gavin
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
