Huib Wrote:It's also contra-productive because nobody in the dev team now bothers to listen to him anymore after so many rants.
/H
Adolf Vahringer Wrote:Well, I would hope that they listen to him because he makes some very good points. To ignore his concerns just because you do not like what he is saying is nothing more than arrogance.
/H
Adolf:
Ed has stated many times that he feels that there is a problem with the new assault rules. Maybe there is and maybe there is not, I can't say for certain. From some of his prior statements he has sent some examples in and did not like the responses that he got. Now he refuses to send in any more examples and he has just decided to complain that the system is broken. This is not a constructive attitude. I have to admit that some of the responses to what he has said are not constructive either.
I think that what needs to be done at this point is that both sides need to step back and look at what has been said and cool off. Neither side has the high ground at this point as both sides are guilty of arrogance and sending derogatory posts.
For those that feel that there is a problem with the new assault rules, send in examples of your complaints with your explainations. It may take quite a number of examples to prove that there is a problem. For those on the development team look at the examples with a cool head and no preconcieved notions. There may in fact be a problem that you are not seeing.
Remember the fairy tale of the boy who called Wolf. If you keep complaining with no examples people WILL stop listening to you. That is a fact!
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
