• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


"Realism" vs "Playability"
11-13-2008, 06:53 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-13-2008, 06:54 AM by Jason Petho.)
#29
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability"
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:That really did not answer my question, but rather indicated that I must have a level of incompetence with the 1.04 assaults.

Please refer the above post where I stated that assaults when from 90% success down 20% success (backed up by Mr. RR and zeiss).

I asked a simple question and you instead insulted me.

If you don't want to answer the question fine, but please don't insult my ability to play the game.

Thanx!

Hawk

No insult nor disrespect was intended.

Just like the Disrupt, Surround and Assault tactic. Some are better at it than others. Some took months to grasp the concept while others never grasped it at all. Some Master it completely. Different learning curves for everyone. It takes time to master them... just like the Campaign Series. It is easy to learn, difficult to master. Why not give them a chance for awhile?

Should there be the 1.02 rules, the 1.04 rules, the 1.05 toned down rules, the 1.05b toned down even more rules, the 1.05c toned down even more, but better than 1.02 rules.. etc etc.

Jason Petho
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
"Realism" vs "Playability" - by Valor - 11-11-2008, 09:49 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by British Tommy - 11-11-2008, 10:59 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Chuck10mtn - 11-11-2008, 11:14 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by British Tommy - 11-12-2008, 12:35 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by junk2drive - 11-11-2008, 11:18 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by schnurbart - 11-11-2008, 03:10 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Huib Versloot - 11-11-2008, 08:23 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Valor - 11-11-2008, 09:05 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Huib Versloot - 11-11-2008, 11:31 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Valor - 11-12-2008, 12:17 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Kool Kat - 11-12-2008, 02:09 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Huib Versloot - 11-12-2008, 03:07 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Mike Abberton - 11-12-2008, 02:50 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-12-2008, 03:25 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Von Earlmann - 11-12-2008, 06:49 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-12-2008, 07:03 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Huib Versloot - 11-12-2008, 08:04 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by zeiss - 11-12-2008, 10:42 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 06:24 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 06:42 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 06:53 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 07:07 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Kool Kat - 11-13-2008, 07:42 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 07:45 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Kool Kat - 11-13-2008, 08:06 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 08:10 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Kool Kat - 11-13-2008, 11:25 PM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-14-2008, 01:13 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 07:05 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 10:00 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by Jason Petho - 11-13-2008, 07:20 AM
RE: "Realism" vs "Playability" - by schnurbart - 11-14-2008, 01:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)