Pip Roberts Wrote:How much longer will we waste our precious message board debating what I still regard as trivia ? How important were trucks compared to the use of Armour, Artillery, Aircraft and troops ? NOT VERY. So why don't we get back to helpful comments on Tactics or the joy of discovering great scenarios and passing on messages about them to other CS gamers.
Isn't it time we had some discussion about using the interesting new units now available through Matrix instead of criticising the developers over minor points?
To me the pleasure of this great game which I have been playing for 11 years now is in meeting and playing friends from all over the world, with winning or losing incidental to discovering the difficulties of command.
I also enjoy LCG's and even (though some would scorn me for it) playing the AI in selected scenarios of significant battles in WWII.
I have difficulty reconciling an interesting discussion on a point relevant, I understand, to the entire Scenario Bank, with your first sentence above. Increase the point value of a truck from 1 to 3 and you must have some effect on existing scenarios.
And I am sure your views on the importance of trucks would be of interest to the lads freezing in their holes, short of food water and ammo because the stuff couldn't be got to them. In the real world, while the combat arms get the kudos, they cannot function without supply, nor achieve realistic levels of manouevre without some form of mechanical transport
If this, or any other discussion, is of no interest, why then waste further space on our precious message board?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
