My thoughts on the H2H and CS.

[medlinke]

I certainly respect the notion that the club should shy away from rewarding players for merely pumping their stats. Clearly that's not the intent of the club and I would hate for incentivizing the H2H scenario playtest process to be seen in that light.

My argument is really a corellary to what Foul has said about the importance of the H2H process. If TheBlitz feels that the H2H is that integral to the life of the club, it's much easier to demonstrate that importance through incentives than banging merely banging a drum and hoping people follow.

I absolutely agree that H2H created scenarios are important to the continuing health of the community. Foul is dead on in reminding folks of that importance and I don't think CS is exempt due to a huge catalog of available scenarios.

The issue is that the system, as it stands, appears flawed. Now, that said, implementing the kind of sweeping changes that are proposed isn't as simple as waving a wand! If there are scoring changes, etc. then all that has to be coded which means a significant investment of someone's time to code it, test it, and implement it on the site.

Very interesting discussion though!