RE: Chaning attachments
> Example....Bulge, 106 Div remnants and 112 Rgt of the 28 Div were attached to 7 Arm Div for a little while. I think if it was to happen, the extra HQs would have to be added to make it work as far as creating KG/TFs.
Well, I don't want to give you false hope but I don't see this happening.
The way I look at it is like this - using your example. Can the 112 Rgt of the 28th Div, work with the 7th Arm Div in the game, using the existing HQs and command rules or was this Div so far away from Div HQ that it is impossible for them to function with the same effectiveness?
I can't imagine the remnants of the 106th would be very effecive, but in any case having the Div and Bridge HQs in the same area of the 7th Arm HQs would have the same effect.
But if you can show that this particular 112 Regt of the 28th can't do what they did historically (and I asmit that ever action can't be done by the game either) then we might have a case where we need to adjust the HQ command range of either\and the DIv and Rgt HQ so that the game engine can accomodate this situation.
Our feeling is the Corps Attachment Rules are complex enough as they are when you consider that things are all kept track of in lists. And there are some Huges OOBs like France 40 which would be quite unmanagle at this level of detail.
Glenn
|