RE: Chaning attachments
Howdy,
Your last comment about OOBs is pretty much what I thought, every unit would have to be on the list. Whether a lot or a little coding was to be involved, the OOBs would be a lot of time consuming typing by itself. If it was to ever happen, would be a very long term project unless it could be overcome by copy and paste from the organization menu. Wouldn't be so long then, but still time consuming.
As for 112 Rgt at the Bulge, they had gotten separated from the 28 div on the south side of the Bulge, ending up on the north side. Most people don't play with the air/arty strike by map, so if 112 is north of the Bulge, they don't have any arty support unless they can also save the arty that starts the game near them.
So I figure if anything like this idea was to happen, it would be more like all rgt/bde/KG/TF hqs would be added to the game and assignment list and all div and higher hqs would be on the assigned to list so that a person can reassign a rgt to another div. Another example would be CCB 10 Arm reassigned to 101 AB at Bastogne.
I've never noticed.....if for example, CCB 10 Arm and 101 Div are both attached to VIII Corps, are units of CCB able to spot for and use 101 Div arty for their support?
So in the end, if anything like this was to be possible, it would only go as low as rgt/bde hqs that could be reassigned to other div/corps if need be.
Thanks again for taking the time to look at this novel.
Mark
|